Legal Opinion

Empire State Bank v. Varpness

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 4, 1986No. C2-86-921Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Empire State Bank appeals the trial court’s denial of its claim arising from a note executed by respondent Norman Varpness. The jury found, by special verdict, that the bank had induced Varpness to sign the note by fraudulent misrepresentation. Based on this finding, the trial court held that the note was unenforceable. We reverse and remand with instructions to enter judgment for the bank.

FACTS

Bernard Belling operated two farms in southern Minnesota: the Rosvold farm and the LeMon farm. Belling depended on financing from the Empire State Bank (bank) for the continued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Reiter v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Sawyer v. TildahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. State v. HemstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Nelson v. HenningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API