Legal Opinion

Hague & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 1, 1916No. 1664PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7817 (T. D. 35912).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

The merchandise is metal safety pins and hairpins, lacquer coated. They were assessed for duty as “pins with solid heads without ornamentation, including safety pins and hairpins” under the provisions of paragraph 158 of the act of October 3, 1913, which reads:

158. Pins with solid heads, without ornamentation, including hair, safety, hat, bonnet, and shawl pins; any of the foregoing composed wholly of brass, copper, iron, steel, or other base metal, not plated with gold or silver, and not commonly known as jewelry, 20 per centum ad valorem.

The importers, who are appellants here, claim the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Samuel Schiff & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Arico, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API