Legal Opinion

Titus v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 12, 1963No. [App. No. 77, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

233 Md. 618 (1963)

195 A.2d 682

TITUS

v.

WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 77, September Term, 1963.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 12, 1963.

Before the full Court.

2Per curiam

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of Judge Foster in the court below. On the point of illegal search, Judge Foster held that the point was not open on post conviction because the record showed that no objection was made at the trial on July 2, 1962, after the decision of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643. We agree. See Porter v.…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Shorey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Edwards v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. Easter v. Dundalk Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howington v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Raven v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Raven v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API