Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Capitol Airways, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 9, 1959No. Civ. No. 19305Published

1Opinion of the Court

ZAVATT, District Judge.

The sole question presented by the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is whether, as a matter of law, the defendant is not a “common carrier” within the meaning of section 181, Title 45 U.S.C.A., extending the provisions of the Railway Labor Act to:

“ * * * every common carrier by air engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, and every carrier by air transporting mail for or under contract with the United States Government, and every air pilot or other person who performs any work as an employee or subordinate official of such carrier or carriers, subject to its or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alaska Air Transport, Inc. v. Alaska Airplane Charter Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1947
  2. Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
  3. Pacific Northern Airlines, Inc. v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API