Legal Opinion

In re Dahata R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that respondent mother (respondent) abandoned her four children (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]; [5] [a]). Contrary to the contention of respondent, the evidence does not establish that petitioner prevented or discouraged her from contacting her children or visiting with them (see, Matter of Nicole P., 275 AD2d 952; Matter of Howard R., 258 AD2d 893, 894). Furthermore, respondent failed to show that she had good reason for failing to visit or otherwise contact the children.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Catholic Child Care Society of DioceseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Robare v. Plattsburgh Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re Nicole P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Rosalinda R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re Madelynn T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. In re Madelynn T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. T., MADELYNN, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API