Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,454, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2277, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3007 Albert Binder Estelle Binder, in Their Individual Capacities and on Behalf of One or More Classes of Persons Similarly Situated v. Thomas Gillespie Marie Mullen Gillespie T. Gordon Sim Diane L. Karban John A. Good, Ian R. Wilson Cary S. Fitchey Mark L. Stevens Deloitte & Touche Mark Stevenson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1999No. 97-35943Published

1Opinion of the Court

172 F.3d 649

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,454, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2277,

1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3007

Albert BINDER; Estelle Binder, in their individual

capacities and on behalf of one or more classes of

persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Thomas GILLESPIE; Marie Mullen Gillespie; T. Gordon Sim;

Diane L. Karban; John A. Good, Defendants,

Ian R. Wilson; Cary S. Fitchey; Mark L. Stevens; Deloitte

& Touche; Mark Stevenson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-35943.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1998.

Decided March 30, 1999.

Robert H. Bretz, Marina del…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API