Legal Opinion
Syed Abdullah v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 8, 1999No. 2109, Docket 96-6206PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, who are undocumented aliens, brought this suit against the Immigration and Naturalization Service (the “INS”), alleging that it employed unconstitutional policies and practices in denying their petitions for Special Agricultural Worker (“SAW”) status under 8 U.S.C. § 1160. The district court (Schwartz, J.) granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs on three of their claims and ordered the INS to readjudicate. See Abdullah v. INS, 921 F.Supp. 1080 (S.D.N.Y.1996).
The INS contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction because 8 U.S.C § 1160(e)(1)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ramirez v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Francine M. Neilson v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Colgate Palmolive S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Bhaktibhai-Patel v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- De Dandrade v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- United States v. Posada CarrilesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.