Dunham v. . Hastings Pavement Company
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 15,1907, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term ovérruling a demurrer to the complaint in an action to recover on contract. . The following questions were certified: “ 1. Does the third amended complaint herein state facts sufficient- to constitute a cause of action in the ‘ first cause of action’ therein set forth? “ 2. Does…
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 15,1907, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term ovérruling a demurrer to the complaint in an action to recover on contract. . The following questions were certified: “ 1. Does the third amended complaint herein state facts sufficient- to constitute a cause of action in the ‘ first cause of action’ therein set forth? “ 2. Does the third amended complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in the ‘ second and separate…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; questions certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Bradford v. Durkee Marine Products Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1943
- Beck v. BaumanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919