Ringo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DICE, Judge.
The conviction is for the possession of marihuana; the punishment, eight years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
The evidence shows that upon a search of the appellant, following his arrest without a warrant, he was found in possession of eighteen marihuana cigarettes.
Appellant urged during the trial, and now insists, that he was illegally arrested and therefore the subsequent search of his person without a warrant was unlawful.
The facts and circumstances surrounding appellant’s arrest, as given by the arresting officer, Amos Johnson, who testified both out of and in the presence…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Constant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
3Cited by9 opinions
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Parson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Roach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Piland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Tawater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.