Legal Opinion

Ringo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1955No. 27392PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICE, Judge.

The conviction is for the possession of marihuana; the punishment, eight years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The evidence shows that upon a search of the appellant, following his arrest without a warrant, he was found in possession of eighteen marihuana cigarettes.

Appellant urged during the trial, and now insists, that he was illegally arrested and therefore the subsequent search of his person without a warrant was unlawful.

The facts and circumstances surrounding appellant’s arrest, as given by the arresting officer, Amos Johnson, who testified both out of and in the presence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Constant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Parson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Roach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Piland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Tawater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API