Legal Opinion

Hawk v. Western & Atlantic Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1917No. 8428, 8429PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for damages; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Fite. December 16, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

1. The rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed except where the verdict is demanded by the evidence is applicable to the first grant of a new trial to the defendant in the action, *396although a new trial had been previously granted the plaintiff in the same case. Jordan v. Dooly, 129 Ga. 392 (58 S. E. 879) ; Butler v. Sansone, 138 Ga. 767 (76 S. E. 54).

Decided June 27, 1917. Action for damages; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Fite. December 16, 1915. W. G. Martin, M. G. Tarver, for plaintiff. Tye, Peeples & Tye, Maddox, McGamy & Shumate, for defendant.

2. The order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jordan v. DoolySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Butler v. SansoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mays v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Piedmont Wagon & Manufacturing Co. v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Gay v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Jones v. J. S. H. CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API