Legal Opinion

(HC) Franklin v. Fisher, Jr.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 25, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00802Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY FRANKLIN, No. 2:19-cv-0802 KJM DB P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 R. FISHER, Jr., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 19 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford 20 the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API