Legal Opinion

City of Bremerton v. Corbett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 25, 1985No. 7501-6-II; 7566-1-II; 7844-9-11; 7894-5-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.

—The City of Bremerton appeals dismissal of three driving while intoxicated cases (RCW 46.61-.502) and one physical control case (RCW 46.61.504), in which the municipal court held the City's evidence insufficient to satisfy the corpus delicti-corroboration rule as a prerequisite to allowing each defendant's admission into evidence. State v. Hamrick, 19 Wn. App. 417, 576 P.2d 912 (1978). The Superior Court affirmed. We accepted discretionary review, consolidated the cases, and now reverse. We hold that the Hamrick corroboration rule was satisfied in each case.

Mary A. Carr, Sherrie G. Burkhart,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Richard Kenichi Kaneshiro, A.K.A. Richard Higa, and George Ekita v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. State v. SmelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Bremerton v. CorbettWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. AshurstCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. City of Bremerton v. CorbettWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Farmers Insurance Co. v. Gleason (In re Gleason)District Court, W.D. Washington · 1992
  5. State v. Cardenas-FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API