State v. Ramoin

The accused was convicted, of manslaughter. His appeal presents only-two points, which, for convenience, we consider in reverse order to wit:

I

He moved (1) for a new trial on the usual perfunctory ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, with which, of course, we have nothing to do; and (2) that the prosecution against him be dismissed (substantially, in a'i'rest of judgment) on the ground that the deceased (not the accused himself) was under the age of 17 years, and the juvenile court, not the district court, had jurisdiction over the offense with which he was charged [to wit,…