Inapro, Inc. v. Alex Hofrichter, P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING GRANTED
2Per curiam
Following the dissolution of a law firm partnership, Alex Hofrichter, P.A., f/k/a Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A. (Hofrichter) moved for production of the claims files of Pacific Employer’s Insurance Company (PEIC) relating to various claims made by and against Hofri-chter’s former partner, litigation Hofrichter claimed it had financed. PEIC objected, arguing that the documents sought were privileged. The lower court referred the matter to a special master. The special master reviewed the documents and categorized them as privileged or non-privileged. Hofrichter then entered his…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. NakutisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. SwilleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- State v. DiversSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- DeBartolo-Aventura, Inc. v. HernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. LaForetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Scotty's Inc. v. OlivieriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Paracelsus Santa Rosa Medical Center v. HulseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998