Legal Opinion

Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. v. Sigray, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 1, 2025No. 5:21-cv-01129Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 CARL ZEISS X-RAY MICROSCOPY, Case No. 21-cv-01129-EJD INC., 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 10 STRIKE LATE-DISCLOSED v. WITNESSES 11 SIGRAY, INC., Re: ECF No. 248 12 Defendant. 13 14 Plaintiff Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. (“Zeiss”) brought this patent infringement and 15 trade secret misappropriation case against Sigray, Inc. (“Sigray”). Zeiss alleges that Sigray 16 misappropriated trade secrets generally related to x-ray microscopy and infringes

U.S. Patent No. 17

7,057,187 (the “’187…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Hernandez v. Polanco Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API