Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 31, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Circuit Attorney of the City of St. Louis filed in the circuit court a verified information based on Section 3347, Revised Statutes 1919, charging defendant with executing, with intent to defraud, to one Williams, in consideration of the debt mentioned therein, a chattel mortgage on a Seeburg orchestration organ of the value of six hundred dollars, without reciting therein that he had previously given to one Blase, in consideration of the debt mentioned therein, a chattel mortgage on the organ described, which was then and there outstanding and in full force. The jury returned a verdict…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Trono v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. State v. StandiferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. State v. SimmsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. State v. FischerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. StallingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. State v. BeardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. State v. PerezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API