Legal Opinion

Motor Expressmen's Union v. Mistletoe Express Service

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided November 22, 1978No. CA 3-78-0001-CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*144MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM M. TAYLOR, Jr., District Judge.

This case is before the Court as a result of an arbitration award of Arbitrator A. Q. Sartain (hereinafter referred to as “arbitrator”) rendered in favor of the Plaintiffs, Robert Hanko (hereinafter referred to as “grievant” or “Hanko”) and Motor Express-men’s Union (hereinafter referred to as the “Union”), and against the Defendant, Mistletoe Express Service (hereinafter referred to as “Mistletoe” or “Company”), on September 19, 1977. By Motion for Summary Judgment supported by their Brief, together with various exhibits, affidavits,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mistletoe Express Service, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Motor Expressmen's Union, a Labor Organization, and Roy MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  2. Mistletoe Express Service v. Motor Expressmen's UnionDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API