Legal Opinion
Lurie v. Steckel
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 12, 1949No. Civ. No. 24428PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKIN, District Judge.
A question has been raised in this case as to my right and power to act as judge without a special designation in view of my retirement from regular and active service as of August 31, 1949. The question is based upon the wording of Paragraph (d) of Section 294 of the New Judicial Code, Title 28 U.S.C.A., which reads : “No retired justice or judge shall perform judicial duties except when designated and assigned.”
It should be noted that that section is a part of Chapter 13, which is entitled, “Assignment Of Judges To Other Courts”. It has no applicability to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Booth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Maxwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Steckel v. LurieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Adams v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Arlin M. Adams and Neysa C. Adams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in 87-1394. William J. Nealon, Jr. And Jean M. Nealon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in 87-1395. Clarence C. Newcomer and Jane M. Newcomer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in 87-1396. Daniel H. Huyett, 3rd and Mary J. Huyett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in 87-1397Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988