Women Prisoners of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Revised Motion to Stay and/or Modify Judgment. The Court shall deny the Motion to Stay because the Defendants have not met the necessary standards used to justify such action. The Court, however, will modify certain provisions of the remedial Order of December 13, 1994, 877 F.Supp. 634, as amended (“the Order”).
II. Background
This matter came before the Court as a class action in which women prisoners at the Lorton Minimum Security Annex (“Annex”), the Correctional Treatment Facility…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Barney v. PulsipherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Juana Villegas v. The Metro. Gov't of NashvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Women Prisoners of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Nelson v. Correctional Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.