Legal Opinion

In Re Petrobras SEC. Litig.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 30, 2019No. 18-2270 (Con)Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-2270 (Con) In re Petrobras Sec. Litig. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. In Re Literary Works in Electronic DatabasesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. STWB, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API