Legal Opinion

McAndrews v. United States Lines Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 5, 1958PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

This is a motion made by counsel for Chelsea Ship Repair Corporation, a third party defendant in the above-entitled action, to strike from the Jury Calendar trial of the action of the United States Lines Company as third party plaintiff against the said Chelsea Ship Repair Corporation.

The above-entitled action of Joseph McAndrews, plaintiff, against United States Lines Company as defendant has been settled and is being discontinued; likewise, the action of United States Lines Company as third party plaintiff against T .Hogan & Sons, Inc. as a third party defendant is…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sergio Degioia v. United States Lines Company, and Third-Party v. American Stevedores, Inc., and Imparato Stevedoring Corp., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Rosen v. DickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Andrews v. StrubleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. In re N-500L CasesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  5. Banks v. Hanover Steamship Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API