Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Stanton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 25, 1977No. 76-512PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal brings before us for the second time the Utah Supreme Court’s construction of Utah Code Ann. § 15-2-1 (1973),1 which established 21 as the age of majority for males, and 18 as the age for females, as applied to a parent’s obligation to support his children. In our first opinion, we held that this distinction between males and females violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Stanton v. Stanton, 421 U. S. 7 (1975) (Stanton I).2 We, of course, did not decide how Utah was to eliminate the discrimination between the *502genders,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Stanton v. StantonUtah Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Illinois Republican Party v. J. B. PritzkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Califano v. JobstSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Roger G. Des Vergnes v. Seekonk Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. Bailey v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API