Miller v. State

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for burglary and rape.

1. Defendant first claims that the court erred in charging the jury on reasonable doubt by failing to mention doubt that might arise from consideration of defendant’s testimony alone. After instructing on the presumption of innocence and the state’s burden of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the court defined *719reasonable doubt to include such doubt as would remain "after considering all the evidence in the case.” Such a statement is sufficient to include evidentiary conflicts. White v. State, 129 Ga. App.…