Legal Opinion

Alméstica v. Lafitte

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided November 15, 1948No. 9823Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marrero

In an action of unlawful detainer at sufferance brought on May 3, 1948, in the District Court of Ponce, by-Pedro Ismael Rios against Miguel Lafitte, the complaint, in short, alleged that the plaintiffs owned an urban property recently acquired by them; that they sought in good faith to recover possession of said property for their personal use and occupancy; that they had served on the defendant a written notice informing him of the reason why they desired to recover said property; and that more than 60 days had elapsed since said notice was served.

*326The defendant demurred 1 to the complaint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Porea v. MosesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API