Legal Opinion

Camarata v. City of Lynnwood

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2002No. 00-35352; D.C. No. CV-98-01826-JCCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Gene A. Camarata appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment. We affirm.

I

The district court properly denied Camarata’s motion to remand because it had subject matter jurisdiction over Camarata’s claims asserted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Munger v. City of Glasgow Police Dep’t, 227 F.3d 1082, 1085 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that the federal courts have jurisdiction over § 1983 claims). The fact that the defendants have raised some Eleventh Amendment defenses does not alter this conclusion. Wis. Dep’t of Corr. v. Schacht, 524 U.S. 381, 389, 118 S.Ct. 2047, 141 L.Ed.2d 364…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re: America West Airlines, Inc., Debtor. El Paso City of Texas v. America West Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Pierce v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. James Gillette v. Duane Delmore Jerry Garriott and the City of Eugene, a Political Subdivision of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API