Legal Opinion

Stringham v. Saint Nicholas Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1867PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. This action was brought by Joseph Stringham upon a policy of insurance issued to one Spaulding, under whom he claimed as assignee. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the chief justice.

1Opinion of the Court

Davies, Ch. J.

—This is an action upon a policy of insurance, issued "by the defendants to one L. Austin Spaulding, on July 12,1836, in the sum of §3,000, upon a stone flouring mill and machinery therein. On June 30, 1857, upon payment by Spaulding, the policy was renewed for one year from July 12, 1857, to July 12, 1833. On August 25,1857, Spaulding assigned the policy and all his interest therein to U. II. Wolfe, and on October 5, 1857, Wolfe assigned the policy and all his interest therein to the plaintiff. The property covered by the policy was totally consumed by fire on November 15,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. CraneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
  2. Lessee of Plumsted v. RudebaghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1795

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eaton v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Agricultural Insurance v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API