Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Cintas (CONSENT)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 11, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00626Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PORTIA OSBORNE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Act. No: 2:19-cv-626-SMD ) CINTAS, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the undersigned is Plaintiff Portia Osborne’s (“Osborne”) Motion to Remand (Doc. 6), arguing that Defendant Cintas is unable to prove that its case meets the $75,000 amount-in-controversy requirement, and therefore, the case should be remanded to state court. Cintas filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. 10), and Osborne filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. 11); thus, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API