Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Ink

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1985No. 82-2286PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, a Kansas organization which provides assistance to low income residents and a recipient of such assistance, brought this action challenging defendants’ refusal to fund the entire 1981 program year of the organization. This refusal followed a decision by Congress to replace the former system of direct federal funding of state and local anti-poverty organizations with a block grant program effective October 1, 1981.

The district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, treating it as a motion for summary judgment, both on the merits and on the ground that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State of New Mexico v. Donald T. Regan, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Russell B. Tafoya and Lydia Tafoya v. U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Christopher Village, L.P. And Wilshire Investments Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Jim Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Nero v. Cherokee Nation of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Pueblo of Laguna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API