Legal Opinion

State v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 2010No. COA10-25PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge.

Darrell Boyd (“defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress and further claims that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion to replace a juror during trial, and (2) calculating his sentence. After careful review, we affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion to suppress and hold that the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to replace a juror. Because the trial court erred in calculating defendant’s prior record level, we remand for a new sentencing hearing.

Background

On the morning of 1 May…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. BonneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. ThreadgillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. GalbreathCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API