Legal Opinion
International Bank of Miami, N.A. v. Shinitzky
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 23, 2003No. 4D02-4339PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner, International Bank of Miami, seeks certiorari review of an October 2, *11892002 order granting respondent’s, Fleet National Bank f/k/a BankBoston (Fleet), motion to compel production of a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)1 in a lawsuit involving claims of investment fraud, conspiracy, and civil theft. Petitioner also seeks certiorari review of an October 31, 2002 order denying petitioner’s motion to vacate the trial court’s orders of February 1, 20012 and October 2, 2002 regarding the SAR. We grant the petition and quash the October 2, 2002 order and the October 31, 2002 order as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoecherSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Weil v. Long Island Savings BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Gregory v. Bank One, Indiana, N.A.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. v. HillmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Regions Bank v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- INTERNATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, NA v. ShinitzkyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003