Legal Opinion
LIN v. HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 19, 2024No. 3:18-cv-15387Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JAY LIN, et al., Civ. No. 18-15387 (RK)(JBD) Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM ORDER v. HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, et al., Defendants. Before the Court is a renewed fee petition filed by defendants Hudson City Savings Bank and M&T Bank (collectively, “Hudson City”) seeking an order directing plaintiffs, Jay Lin and Irene Lin, to pay defendants’ attorneys’ fees pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Dkt. 80]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Hudson City’s fee petition in full.1 1 This Court has authority to enter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Interfaith Community Organization Lawrence Baker Martha Webb Herring Margaret Webb Rev. Winston Clarke Margarita Navas v. Honeywell International, Inc. Formerly Known as Alliedsignal, Inc. Roned Realty of Jersey City, Inc. Roned Realty of Union City, Inc. W.R. Grace & Company Ecarg, Inc. W.R. Grace, Ltd. W.R. Grace & Company Ecarg, Inc. W.R. Grace, Ltd., Defendants/third-Party v. Heller-Jersey City, L.L.C. Home Depot, U.S.A. Seaman Furniture Company, Inc., Third-Party Hackensack Riverkeeper, Inc. William Sheehan v. Honeywell International, Inc. F/k/a Alliedsignal, Inc. Roned Realty of Jersey City, Inc. Roned Realty of Union City, Inc. W.R. Grace, Ltd. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Lanni v. New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Rayna P. v. Campus Cmty. Sch.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Keister v. PPL Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.