Legal Opinion
Towey v. Catling
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided August 10, 1990No. Civ. 89-00554 DAEPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST AND COSTS AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES
DAVID A. EZRA, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Towey (“Towey”) seeks prejudgment interest, costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to an amended judgment entered in Towey’s favor in the above captioned matter on May 9, 1990. Towey contends that in accordance with Rule 26 of the Hawaii Arbitration Rules he is entitled to his costs and attorneys’ fees (not to exceed $5,000.00). He also asserts he is entitled to prejudgment interest in the amount of 10% on the entire judgment from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Columbia Brick Works, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United California Bank v. THC Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Imperial Food Imports, and American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hum v. DericksDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
- Auld-Susott v. GalindoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023
- Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023