Legal Opinion

3405 Putnam Realty Corp. v. Insurance Corporation of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered March 28, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant insurer’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint and denied the cross motion by defendants Kelly and Ortiz for summary judgment to strike defendant insurer’s answer to their cross claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Kelly and Ortiz are plaintiffs in an underlying action against plaintiff 3405 Putnam Realty for injuries allegedly arising due to ingestion of lead paint. 3405 Putnam Realty brought the instant declaratory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Worcester Insurance v. BettenhauserNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Lang v. Hanover InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Maroney v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. M-Dean Realty Corp. v. General Security InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cataract Sports & Entertainment Group v. Essex InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Kirschenbaum ex rel. Estate of EMS Financial Services, LLC v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  3. United Specialty Insuance Company v. Lux Maintenance & Ren. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API