Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Kelly
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 23, 2012No. 09 CIV. 3162(ALC)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge:
Defendants Sergeant Stephen Kelly and Officers Michael McAuliffe and Thomas Dekoker (collectively, “defendants”) move for (1) judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to rule 50, Fed.R.Civ.P., (2) for a new trial pursuant to Rule 59, Fed.R.Civ.P., or (3) in the alternative, for remittitur of the damages awards. For the reasons given below, the defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law is denied. The defendants’ motion for a new trial with respect to defendants’ liability is also denied. The defendants’ motion for a new trial is…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jackson v. TelladoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Graham v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Alla v. VerkayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Deanda v. HicksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Tretola v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.