Fox v. Asheville Army Store, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentSeawell, J.
While in ber complaint tbe plaintiff does set up tbe fact tbat tbe injury to ber eye, caused by tbe negligence of tbe defendant, has deprived ber of tbe opportunity of engaging in teaching in tbe public schools, to which ber life work bad been devoted, and tbat sbe has received damage on tbat score, tbe allegations are quite sufficient to sustain a recovery for damages to ber earning capacity when employed in any other occupation which might be open to her. Any evidence relative to tbat claim cannot’ be excluded without error. Tbe objection and tbe exception to tbe admission of evidence tbat…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wallace v. Western N. C. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Rayburn v. Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Howard Oil Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Broyles v. PrisockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. ShamosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.