Legal Opinion

Kim v. Mercy Clinic Springfield Cmtys.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 2018No. Nos. SD 34547 & SD 34561 ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMary W. Sheffield, P.J.

This case comes before the Court on cross appeals by Mercy Clinic Springfield Communities ("Clinic") and Dr. Hyewon Kim ("Dr. Kim"). Clinic brings three points that each challenge the trial court's denial of Clinic's motions for directed verdict and motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict ("JNOV") as to Dr. Kim's claim for constructive discharge in violation of public policy. Dr. Kim brings two points asserting Clinic's counterclaim for unjust enrichment should have failed. Finding that Clinic's points on appeal are waived because Clinic did not present a motion for directed verdict…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Houston v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Sanders v. AhmedSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aughenbaugh v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. HYEWON ("HELEN") KIM, M.D., Plaintiff-Respondent and MERCY CLINIC SPRINGFIELD COMMUNITIES, Defendant-Respondent v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Intervenor-AppellantMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. JULIE N. MAY, Claimant-Respondent v. GOLDEN PARTNERS, INC., Employer-Appellant and MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API