Beadleston & Woerz v. Morton
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal- by defendants from judgment rendered in the Third Judicial District Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The defendants purchased the saloon No. 9 Muís ray street, on which there was a chattel mortgage held by plaintiff, a domestic corporation. The mortgage was made by the former proprietor, Gertrude A. Fox, for the sum of $6,750, and covered the lease, goods, chattels and fixtures of the place.
The plaintiff entered into a written agreement with the defendants by which certain clauses in the mortgage were modified and the time. of. payment extended, and the defendants assumed the mortgage to the extent of $2,400. By the third paragraph of said agreement defendants.promised to promptly pay on the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Olcott v. . Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Olcott v.Tioga Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Lathers v. HuntNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bloomingdale v. GaudioAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
- M. Groh's Sons v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1903