Porter v. State

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

We have again carefully examined bill of exception No. 1 and are unable to agree with appellant’s renewed contention that the court abused its discretion in excusing the officers of the court from operation of the rule as to witnesses.

Appellant insists that the principle announced in Carter v. State, 22 S. W. (2d) 659; Gartman v. State, 57 S. W. (2d) 137; Martin v. State, 54 S. W. (2d) 812, and in other cases of similar import is fundamentally wrong. We fail to perceive necessity for reviewing the cases or writing further supporting the…