Legal Opinion
McPherson v. Employment Division
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1979No. TC 77-AB-862, CA 8816, SC 25719Published
1Opinion of the Court
591 P.2d 1381 (1979)
285 Or. 541
Marlynn M. McPherson, Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, and City of Salem, Respondents.
TC 77-AB-862; CA 8816; SC 25719.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted July 12, 1978.
Decided March 20, 1979.
David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Mike Dye, Dye & Olson.
Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Division. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen.
Jeanette Launer, Asst. City Atty., Salem, argued the cause for respondent City of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.