Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1898No. Appeal, No. 392PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 392, Jan. T., 1897, by Benjamin Hauck, from decree of O. C. Sebuylkill Co., March T., 1897, No. 15, overruling exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 392, Jan. T., 1897, by Benjamin Hauck, from decree of O. C. Sebuylkill Co., March T., 1897, No. 15, overruling exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts appear by the portion of the opinion of Dunn, P. J., which relates to this matter, as follows: Claim of Henry Breisch, now to the use of Benjamin Hauck, on a book account for a balance of $1,297.62. The payment of this claim was objected to by the representatives of the estate, on the grounds that it is not a debt of the estate, and that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. An examination of…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

It is impossible to sustain the entries upon which the appellant relies as valid book entries in any point of view, nor was any testimony given, or offered, which could supply the deficiencies of the entries. The opinion of the auditing judge is a complete vindication of his rulings and on that the decree is affirmed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Conrad's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Stucker v. ShumakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Croushore's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Reddelien v. AtkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Winings v. HearstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API