Legal Opinion

Interboro Insurance v. Clennon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*597“The failure to comply with the provision of an insurance policy requiring the insured to submit to an examination under oath ... is a material breach of the policy, precluding recovery of the policy proceeds” (Argento v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 184 AD2d 487, 487-488 [1992]; see Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC, 82 AD3d 559 [2011]). Here, the plaintiff insurer established as a matter of law that it twice duly demanded an examination under oath from the appellants’ assignor, who had allegedly been injured in a motor vehicle accident, that the assignor twice failed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cajas-Romero v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Unitrin Advantage Insurance v. Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Argento v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flatbush Acupuncture P.C. v. Repwest Ins. Co., Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2025
  2. Flatbush Acupuncture P.C. v. Repwest Ins. Co., Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API