Futurewise v. Reed
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Futurewise and Service Employees International Union Healthcare 775NW seek to prohibit Secretary of State Sam Reed from placing Initiative 960 (1-960) on the November 2007 general election ballot. The King County Superior Court dismissed their action for injunctive and declaratory relief, and they appealed directly to this court. We affirm.
Alexander, C.J.
FACTS
¶2 According to the ballot title’s concise description, 1-960 “would require two-thirds legislative approval or voter approval for tax increases, legislative approval of fee increases, certain published information on tax-increasing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Philadelphia II v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- PHILADELPHIA II v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brown v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Brown v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- League of Education Voters v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- City of Longview v. WallinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- City of Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our Choice!Washington Supreme Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.