Legal Opinion

Maylie v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1991No. 3347PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Plaintiff, Robert J. Maylie, Jr., appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing a cause of action alleged against Maylie’s employer, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation a/k/a AMTRAK, and Steven Scott, an AMTRAK employee, for civil conspiracy to deprive him of a fair trial in an action under The Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., for workplace injuries sustained at AMTRAK’s shop in Bristol, Pennsylvania. The trial court held that plaintiff’s state law claims had been preempted by The Railway Labor Act (RLA), 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deal, M. v. The Children's Hosp. of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Deal, M. v. The Children's Hosp. of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. City of Lancaster v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API