Legal Opinion

North Counties Hydro-Electric Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 8, 1957No. 268-53PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

This is an action by plaintiff for the taking of its hydro-electric power plant on the Fox River in Illinois. It is before us on defendant’s pleas of res adjudicates and the statute of limitations and its answer, and the trial commissioner’s findings of fact, opinion, and recommendation for conclusion of law.

On October 19, 1953, plaintiff filed a motion to strike defendant’s defenses of res adjudicata and the statute of limitations. We overruled this motion because the defenses sought to be stricken were neither trivial nor plainly without merit. We did not pass on the merit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Dominic Eyherabide, Jean M. Eyherabide, Raymond Castanchoa and Marie Castanchoa v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. National By-Products, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. B Amusement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Hartwig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API