Legal Opinion

Commercial Mutual Insurance v. Wagschall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 7, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the plaintiff is under no duty to defend or indemnify the defendant Samuel Chaim Wagschall in a personal injury action entitled Wagschall v Wagschall, pending in Supreme Court, Rockland County, under. Index No. 6610/94, the defendants Baila Wagschall, Herman Wagschall, and Freída Wagschall appeal, and the defendant Samuel Chaim Wagschall separately appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated September 9,1997, which, inter alia, declared that the plaintiff was not obligated to defend or indemnify…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hollander v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. KowalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Kradjian v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Appell v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Fennell v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Fiore v. Excelsior InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Shelby Casualty Insurance v. ComponoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API