Legal Opinion
Allied Chemical Corp. v. Tug Carville
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 29, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 291 of 1965Published
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
HANNUM, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Allied Chemical Corporation (hereafter Allied) is a corporation organized and existing according to law, and at all times material hereto was the owner of the Barge A.C. No. 2.
2. Defendant Southern Transportation Co., Inc. (hereafter Southern) is a corporation organized and existing according to law and during the year 1963 was engaged in towing various floating equipment of Allied, including the Barge A.C. No. 2, under a contract between the parties dated October 13, 1959.
3. Defendant Delaware…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The Schooner Catharine v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe v. Healing, Chairman of Hopi Council of Hopi Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bilkay Holding Corp. v. Consolidated Iron & Metal Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Moran Towing Corp. v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.