Legal Opinion

Hanover Bank, Landlord v. De Koenigsberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1954PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

By leave of the court below the landlord appeals from said order.

On the application for “ extension ” of the stay the tenant states that he did not receive notice of the decision from the court or the landlord’s attorney; “ that deponent was out of town, and when he returned on September 30, 1954 he found out that the decision had been rendered and the stay had expired ’ ’; and that on September 30th an eviction notice was discovered by the tenant under the door of the apartment.

Section 1434 of the Civil Practice Act provides that “ The issuing of a warrant for the removal of a tenant from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitmarsh v. FarnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mennella v. López TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Hanover Bank v. De KoenigsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. Elcock v. BocciaNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Koleoglou v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Emray Realty Corp. v. LloydAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API