Legal Opinion

Myrtle Point Mill & Lumber Co. v. Clarke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Coos: J. S. Coke, Judge. Department 1.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, C. J.

It is a conceded fact that the defendant, together with J. O. Stemmier and eight others, signed the following agreement:

“Myrtle Point, Oregon, March 15th, 1918.
“We, the undersigned, do hereby subscribe to the amount of the capital stock, set opposite to our respective names towards forming a corporation to be known as ‘Myrtle Point Mill & Lbr. Company, Inc.’ with a capital stock of $25,000.00, to be divided into 250 shares of the par value of $100.00 per share, and agree to pay for same as follows: 40 per cent in 30 days; 40 per cent in 60 days and 20 per cent in 90 days. ’ ’

The defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Saratoga Inv. Co. v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Fairview R. R. v. SpillmanOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Oliver v. Grande Ronde Grain Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thielsen v. LindeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Laing v. HuttonOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Myrtle Point Mill & Lbr. Co v. PikeOregon Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API