Legal Opinion

State v. M. Fox & Son

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 21, 1894PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City.' The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBotd, J.

A demurrer to the declaration filed in this case was sustained by the Superior Court of Baltimore City. Judg*521ment was entered on the demurrer and an appeal taken to this Court. It therefore becomes necessary for us to ascertain what facts are alleged as the basis of the suit— they being admitted by the demurrer to be true.

The plaintiffs allege that the defendants are dealers in horses and proprietors of a livery and sale stable, and had in their possession a mare which was “ affected with a contagious and infectious disease called ‘ glanders,’ a disease which is not only fatal to horses, but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Wellington v. Downer Kerosene Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Loop v. . LitchfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Jeffrey v. BigelowNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  5. Losee v. . CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Council of Co-Owners Atlantis Condominium, Inc. v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. State v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Matter of Eldridge v. . Endicott, Johnson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Otis Elevator Co. v. EmbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API