Bedford v. Hol-Tan Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Cross-appeals by the plaintiff, Edward T. Bedford, and the defendant, The Hol-Tan Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made .at the New York Special Term .and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 3d day of August, 1910, setting aside the report of a referee.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
The plaintiff appeals from an order setting aside the decision of a referee heretofore appointed to hear and determine the action, and adjudging the proceedings before the referee a mistrial, and vacating the order of reference and restoring the cause to the Trial Term calendar. The grounds for the order are not stated in the order itself, or in the order to show cause upon the motion which was brought before the court. The defendant’s attorney, however, set forth in an affidavit certain matters which, as he considered, justified his motion, and the court, upon consideration of that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hampton Bays Supply Co. v. AdlerNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Rose v. HellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Baker v. Roddy, New York County Courts1916
- Broderick v. SaretskyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1942